Here, the platform of a possible US attack on Iran+ Photo; America is increasing its power!

The fifth round of Iran -US negotiations in Oman ended with unofficial reports on disagreements between Iran and the US over enrichment. At the end of the talks, however, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Arakchi evaluated the talks forward, and US State Department spokesman Temi Bruce told reporters on Tuesday that the fifth round of talks with Iran was also constructive. While US President Donald Trump's stance on the use of military forces has been reduced if negotiations fail, the re -publishing unofficial reports on Zionist military preparation for military action against Iran has increased the US -led reports on US re -involved US movements.

New satellite images show that the United States is increasing its air capacity at Dienggarisia Base in the Indian Ocean; A strategic base, according to Newsweek, can act as a potential attack on Iran. This information is named after a textual information analyst. MT Anderson has released and the US Department of Defense (Pentagon) has refused to comment on the movements, but the report will use a military option in the midst of nuclear talks and in the event of US President Donald Trump. At the same time, the New York Times and the Israeli Times have revealed that Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened that if he did not contain what he calls Iran's nuclear ambitions, he would disrupt negotiations and propose military attacks on Iranian targets. Donald Trump is said to have taken Netanyahu out of unilateral military action that may disrupt the negotiations, and the two sides' conversation last week was accompanied by verbal tension.

Although Netanyahu's office yesterday also called Trump's tension reports inaccurate, it is not uncommon in US foreign policy as Iran -US negotiations reach the complex stage in the fifth round. American history is full of oriented in the media to achieve specific foreign policy goals. During the Cold War, the CIA attempted to influence domestic and international media to disseminate information in line with the purposes of the US Cold War. The Bush administration used intelligence reports on active weapons programs of Iraq's mass destruction to gain support for the military attack, and in the year, especially in the Obama period. The New York Times, who said, "All options are on the table."

Passing through Trump's rhetoric
While US Special Representative Steve Witekaf in nuclear talks with Iran and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has insisted in recent weeks that they will not accept Iran's enrichment, and Donald Trump, referring to Iran's considerable oil and gas resources, has asked the US to ask the US.

The latest stance is related to Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baqaei, who on Wednesday for the first time rejecting rumors related to Iran's flexibility on the issue of enrichment, said: "Continuing enrichment in Iran as an integral part of the country's nuclear industry is a fundamental principle for the Islamic Republic of Iran." Almost at the same time as the Baqa'i position, Mohammad Islami, head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization, said in a unprecedented statement that if it was agreed to allow US inspectors to be allowed to inspect nuclear facilities through the Agency, the unprecedented flexibility that Iranian officials appear to have shown its flexibility.

Under such circumstances, Donald Trump's repeated rhetoric on "agreement or bombing" seems to have been less effective in negotiations, it seems that the US is trying to influence the negotiations through an alternative approach by creating an indirect valid threat. "The United States has historically used valid military threats to pressure Iran to get privileges," said Michael Singh, a former US State Department official and US policy expert on Iranian affairs. "This method creates a psychological problem for Iran in order to make Tehran accept Washington's conditions with fear of military exacerbation," says Singh.

Will Tehran respond positively?
Will Iran respond positively to this threat? While some observers say that the United States has a combination of hard diplomacy and military signaling, experts are unlikely that the strategy will persuade Iranian officials to ignore enrichment, a program that has spent more than two decades. Speaking at a ceremony to start a meeting of high -level security officials in Moscow yesterday, the secretary of the Russian Security Council, Sergei Shivigo, said yesterday that accepting the right to enrich Iran in the framework of its peaceful use is a key program.

"For Iran, uranium enrichment is a symbol of national honor and self -sufficiency. "Attempts to take this right are politically unacceptable and can destabilize the whole process of negotiation." Michael Single has already left this and the court's reverse warning the US Takritte: "Although the display of military power can be an effective tool in negotiation, it must be implemented carefully. "If Iran sees a existential threat, it may insist on its nuclear program rather than surrender." Wendy Sherman, a US negotiator during the Obama era, recently warned that even in the event of a military attack on Iran's nuclear sites, the country would continue its way secretly and underground. Sherman warns that more pressure leads Iran to radical options; Where even the western parties will no longer have a tool to contain it.