US Secretary of State for Iran!

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in her latest stance on our country: "Iran should not have a nuclear weapon or Israel's threat."

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to CBS News, emphasized that Washington's main policy towards the Islamic Republic of Iran is to prevent the government from accessing nuclear weapons and restricting its ability to threaten neighbors, especially Israel.

Responding to a question about the possibility of uranium enrichment at low -level uranium or the need to completely dismantle the nuclear program, she warned that "the enrichment ability at any level can quickly lead to the level needed for the production of nuclear weapons."

Criticizing the nuclear deal of the year during the presidency of Barack Obama, he claimed that the agreement allowed the Islamic Republic to maintain its key infrastructure for its nuclear program; An issue that, in his claim, "can be potentially very dangerous."

Rubio also cited US President Donald Trump's approach: "Trump prefers to be resolved through diplomatic because he is not looking for war." According to the US Secretary of State, Trump believes that the Iranian people deserve a better future and tends to be a peaceful, prosperous and rich country. "Trump has said he is a manufacturer, not a bomb," Rubio added.

However, he insisted that the United States would ultimately allow the Islamic Republic to achieve nuclear weapons or threatening capabilities. "We are trying to achieve this goal through peaceful and diplomatic ways, but this is a definite goal," Rubio said.

We read the detailed interview of Marco Rubio's Foreign Minister in the program "Face the Nation with Margaret Bernan";

Margaret Brennan: And Foreign Minister Marco Rubio is now joining us from Rome. Mr. Minister, you have a very busy week. I know you were in the Vatican and they have offered a direct meeting between Ukraine and Russia. Given that Vladimir Putin was not present in the negotiations in Istanbul last week, is there a reason to believe that he accepts Pope Leo's offer?

I'm not a spokesman for the Kremlin, but if you've seen their statements, I think yesterday they said they are ready for such a meeting. So we wait and see if this is possible. Obviously, the Vatican has made a very generous offer to host anything, not only the meeting between Zelnski and Putin, but also every meeting, including at the technical level, that every meeting that needs hosting has expressed their desire. So this is a very generous offer that may be considered. I mean, this will be a place where all sides feel comfortable. So we hope to get to the point where the negotiations will be held and the Vatican will have the opportunity to be one of the options.

The Russian Foreign Ministry says you started a call with your Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov on Saturday. What was the subject? Are you talking about planning for that face -to -face meeting between President Putin and President Trump?

Well, we talked about different things. I wanted to know his opinion on yesterday's talks and whether it was a waste of time in Istanbul? That wasn't. For example, the prisoners are to be exchanged, and this is very positive humanitarian. He explained to me that they were preparing a document that determines their requirements for the ceasefire, which would then lead to wider negotiations. So it is obvious that the Ukrainian side is going to work on its offer and I hope this offer will be made soon. And if that happens, and the proposal made by Russia and - and in this regard, Ukrainian suggestions are serious and practical, real progress has been made and we can work on it. So we have to wait and see. But he (Lavrov) wanted me to know, and in our phone call said they would work on a set of ideas and requirements they have to advance the ceasefire and negotiations. So we will wait for it, and we hope that this is a document that is close enough to what the Ukrainians want to reach that point and may solve those disputes.

You have said many times that it only takes a few days to reduce US patience for the success of this diplomacy. Do they only force you to cooperate, as President Trump has said? Are they just looking for negotiation? Are they just looking to continue negotiating to buy time?

Well, that's what we are testing. And that's what we will understand. Look, in the end, what I said and now is happening, we no longer fly around the world and try to arrange meetings. We respond to the meetings that are arranged, and we have always said that if there are opportunities, we are willing to do whatever is needed to bring them together. So I think your question is, do they force us to cooperate? Well, that's what we are trying to understand. We will understand very soon. They met in Türkiye yesterday or yesterday. They have agreed that they were going to renounce the ideas that lead to the ceasefire. If they have realistic and rational ideas, we think we have made progress. On the other hand, if these requests have requirements that we know they are unrealistic, we will have a different evaluation. So, we will try to understand this. And there is a combination here. On the one hand, we are trying to achieve peace and ending a very bloody, costly and destructive war. So an element of patience is needed. On the other hand, we have no time to waste. There are many things happening in the world that we have to pay attention to. So we do not want to be involved in this endless negotiation process, there must be progress, a move forward. And if at the end of this, in the next few days, we get the document made by both parties and show that both parties are rating and realistic and rational in their approach, I think we can feel good about continuing interaction. On the other hand, if what we see is not very constructive, we may have a different evaluation. I also agree that in the end, one of the things that can help break this deadlock, perhaps the only thing that can be a direct conversation between President Trump and Vladimir Putin. And he has already expressed his desire and belief that this should happen, and - and I hope this will be resolved soon.

Do you intend to do this?

Well, I don't know. We certainly have made this offer. The President has already made the proposal publicly. The mechanism of holding such a meeting requires a little bit of work, so I can't say that it is currently planning in terms of location and date selection. But the president wants to do it. He wants to do this as soon as possible. I think the Russian side has also expressed his desire to do it. So, now, the only thing is to bring them together - to bring them all together and determine where and when it will take place and what will be.

Yes, I- I want to deal with other topics. But in the end, your former Senate colleague, Lindsi Graham, was with you at that meeting with the Ukrainian Foreign Minister. He has an unpopular majority of the bill to impose sanctions against Russia. How fast do you want to have more sanctions against Russia? Or do you want him to wait?

No, see, the Senate will eventually take action. I mean, I think in the past, we asked us to give us a little time to see if we can make progress in our negotiations. But we have also been clearly clear to the Russian side for weeks, six or seven weeks ago. We have informed the Russian side that this effort is ongoing. That we anticipated that when everything was said and finished, there would be about five people in the Senate, and I think there was a similar percentage of support in the House of Representatives, that it was an attempt that we could not stop and had no control over, and in the event of the Republican and the Republican, and the Republican. But we - have been advised the Russians many times for almost two months that it will happen if there is no progress. So I think this new [agreement] is getting fruitful. And this is one of the things I have confirmed again on my trip to Lindsi Graham again in Türkiye, which is now to 4 people. He thinks they can get closer to nine or more. And that is just - that's just a fact, and what we have told the Russians for weeks that it was happening.

I want to go to another part of the world. You have been very involved in the government's efforts to suppress this Venezuelan gang, TDA, designated by the United States as a terrorist group. Do you accept the evaluation of the information community that the Venezuelan gang is not the proxy for the Maduro government? This was the assessment of the National Intelligence Council.

Yes, this is their evaluation. They're wrong. In fact, the FBI agrees with me that they are wrong. We agree that Tren D Aragwa was not only issued by the Venezuelan regime, but in fact, if you go back and see a member of Tran de Aragua, there is all the evidence and is increasing every day, in fact, in order to kill an opposition member, I thought it was a few months ago in Chile. Therefore, one of the FBI warnings is not just that Tren D Aragwa is a terrorist organization, but a previously operational organization, to kill one opposition member in another country.